The Supreme Court ruled that two sisters with learning disabilities and a man with conditions including cerebral palsy and Down’s syndrome, who are unable to make their own decisions about their care and welfare, are being deprived of their liberty.
The Supreme Court ruled that these three people are “under continuous supervision and control” and are “not free to leave”.
Thus they are deprived of their liberty. Safeguards must be in place to ensure such protective care regimes are regularly and independently reviewed.
Christian Walsh, a local Best Interests Assessor, also addressed the event.
Susan McKendry, head of Langleys’ health and social care unit, said:
“This judgment will have an immediate impact on those caring for and working with people who lack mental capacity to decide about their care and welfare due to dementia, learning disability, brain injury or mental health difficulties.
“The judgment provides a clear test for what amounts to a deprivation of liberty.
“Independent safeguarding reviews will be required.
“This should lead to the better protection of people who lack capacity to make their own decisions.”